Monday, May 29, 2017
Week of 05/29/2017
Ben Carson
And The Poverty Fallacy
There is not a week that does not go by without someone from the Cult of Donald
Trump doing something stupid. If there
was a counter for the number of days that those in the Cult of Trump do not do
something stupid or say something stupid, it would remain either in the low
single digits or stay at zero. For those
of you in the Cult of Trump, just a little hint: that is not a good thing.
And while this past week’s moments of stupid were clearly off-the-charts,
there was one that was rather innocuous in comparison that, I think, has as
much potential to cause damage to our nation as, say, physically
assaulting a reporter.
Dr. Ben Carson is reportedly a good neurosurgeon. However that does not translate into being
good at other things. He certainly could
not translate that into a successful run for the White House in 2016. Hell, he had a hard time staying awake, and
so did his supporters. But loyalty is
rewarded, and Carson’s loyalties to now-President Donald Trump translated into
him being appointed Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. In other words, he’s in charge of helping
poor people.
You would think that this would be a good fit, since Dr. Carson
supposedly came up from poverty to make a name for himself. He supposedly knows how to get out of that
kind of situation, right?
Except our new HUD secretary thinks that his department – and, by
extension, the federal government in general - should only “help” those who
help themselves.
In a
radio interview last week (as of this column’s
posting date), Dr. Carson said that poverty is “a state of mind”. He says that there are some people that can
have nothing and become successful, and those that could have everything and
still end up with nothing.
In other words, he believes that success, wealth, being able to support
and sustain ourselves and our families is all in our heads. We are poor because we supposedly “choose” to
be poor.
His words bolster those from Trump’s director of the Office of Management
and Budget, Mick Mulvaney, who plans on gutting social programs like a marlin
over the next ten years, including viciously slashing money for food stamps and
disability insurance.
"If you're on food stamps,” career politician Mulvaney said, “and
you're able-bodied, we need you to go to work. If you're on disability
insurance and you're not supposed to be — if you're not truly disabled, we need
you to go back to work.”
In other words, all you poor people are just lazy according to pampered
career politician Mulvaney. And Dr.
Carson says that it’s all in your heads!
You just have to try harder! You
know, like how Texas got out of their drought by “praying harder”.
Now I know that bit of news has some of you pissed off at both of these
gentlemen. It’s sort of expected that
pampered career politician Mulvaney would say something like that. He’s a stereotypical white male GOP
politician from the South who knows just what to say to pander to his
conservative and neo-conservative base.
But Dr. Carson? He must have
snoozed through his past just like he snoozed through his failed presidential
bid.
And yet what pampered career politician Mulvaney and Dr. Carson espouse
about poverty is really nothing new or shocking. This has been the standard mindset of both the
GOP and of conservatives in general at least since the days of Ronald Reagan. They truly believe that poor people are just
lazy and they “choose” to be poor.
This delusion of poverty being a “state of mind” is rooted in a few fallacies
regarding the poor. The first is the
delusion that work brings wealth. It’s
based on a certain mindset from our old religious extremists, the
Puritans.
You remember the Puritans, right?
The ones that couldn’t take care of themselves when they arrived in
America and needed help... you know, welfare... from those “savage” Native
Americans, and thus they created the first Thanksgiving celebration to remember
that. The sadomasochists that actually
outlawed Christmas because it was “too secular” and tortured and killed people
based on rumors from teenaged girls and killed cats simply because. Yeah, those Puritans.
The Puritans believed that work in and of itself was a virtue. “Idle hands are the Devil’s playground,”
according to the old saying. Thus brings
the fallacy that hard work would be “rewarded”, and while the original intent
was for a reward in the “spiritual sense”, it’s not too much of a stretch for
certain people (i.e. rich people) to translate
that into physical “rewards”. This led
to the shortened idea that “work equals wealth”. If you supposedly “worked hard”, you would be
successful and wealthy.
There have been several books over the years that embrace this very
fallacy. “Rich Dad Poor Dad” quickly
comes to mind. They spread the message
that “rich” people are so because they supposedly do “rich” things. They don’t “think like poor people”. They supposedly “make sacrifices” and don’t
“waste money”. They “work hard” and
supposedly don’t take vacations or sick days and they don’t “clock out and go
home” like other people.
All of these, I can tell you from personal experience, are a lie.
There are untold millions of Americans over the years that have worked
long hours doing grueling tasks. A lot
of people work two or even three or four jobs per week just trying to make ends
meet. Remember the “Uniquely American” divorced
mother from 2005 that was working three jobs and President George W. Bush
joked if she got any sleep? If “work
equals wealth”, as the fallacy goes, then there should be an extremely large
number of wealthy people in America. In
fact, that supposed “Uniquely American” divorced mother shouldn’t even have to
work more than just that one job if she put everything she had into it, if the
fallacy were true.
But it is *not* true. It is, by
its very nature, a lie, a delusion, a falsehood designed to wrongly convince
the masses that someone’s success came from something other than a combination
of nepotism, social connections, opportunity, and a lot of blind stinking
doo-dah luck. Oh, and maybe a little bit
of fraud here and there. Just ask Bernie
Madoff if you don’t know what I mean.
That’s not to say there isn’t a mindset at play regarding wealth and poverty. Only it’s not coming from the poor and
huddled masses. Rather, it’s coming from
the “top” of the economic pyramid down.
It’s the mindset of obligation and consumption.
It’s the message that people “have” to get an education, and they “have”
to get married, and they “have” to make babies, and they “have” to work so they
can buy that new car and get that new house that they “have” to have. They “have” to buy that new wardrobe, and
they “have” to buy that new bedroom set, and they “have” to buy that new HDTV
with the 4K display and the curved screen, and they “have” to buy that new
iPhone and that new 5G cellphone service and that new gigabit Internet
service. And they “have” to go on
vacations too. They “have” to go on that
cruise on ships owned by other nations, and fly on those abusive airlines that
treat you worse than cattle.
They “have” to do these things in order to keep the economy going. Because that’s on our heads too, don’t you
know?
And if they can’t afford to do these things, don’t worry; there are
plenty of institutions that will be more than happy to “help” people get these
things that they “have” to get. And by
“help” they really mean put you in debt so you’ll have to work even harder and
work even more hours at the expense of sanity and sleep and any sense of self.
And who are telling you these things?
Who is saying that we “have” to do all these things? Why it is the very wealthy and the very
powerful in society. The ones already on
top. The ones that profit from all of
this consumption and obligation. And if
they aren’t saying it directly, then they’re saying it through advertising
messages in the mass media and through proxies in government. Go ahead, take the week off. Where will you be going on your time
off? You should be going somewhere! We have a few suggestions for you. How’s that car of yours? When will you get a new one?
Let’s not forget the “trickle-down” mindset. As in you give the wealthy and powerful
everything they want so they can be even more wealthy and more powerful and
maybe they’ll trickle some of that success down to the little people. Maybe.
At some point in the future. Just
not right now. And don’t quote us on it
or ask for a timeline when these things will happen. These things are tricky. Who knew these things could be so tricky?
Let’s get brutally honest here… when you have Wal-Mart managers
instructing their hard-working employees on how to apply for food stamps just
so their shareholders will enjoy bigger profit margins, and McDonald’s
executives churning up fairy-tale “instructions” on how you can supposedly
budget in pet grooming on minimum wage, it’s pretty damn clear that the
“poverty mindset” is not coming from the poor and struggling masses. It’s coming from the friends of Doctor Ben
Carson and pampered career politician Mick Mulvaney.
If these gentlemen, and I use the term in the generic sense, were truly
and genuinely concerned about the number of people on social and economic
assistance and are still struggling to make ends meet, then they have no
business chastising and preaching lies and falsehoods to those same struggling
people. They would, instead, be turning
their attention to the big corporations and to the big financial institutions,
the ones that created the economic problems in the first place, and tell them
to clean up their act. To stop putting
profits ahead of their own employees, never mind ahead of people in general. To actually pay their own employees a wage
that would keep them off of economic assistance. To build houses and homes for people of all
incomes, not just the one-percenters and the people they can scam into risky
mortgages.
Then again, that’s not what got them to where they are today, is it? No, they don’t bite the hand that feeds them
and puts them in positions of power and authority. They don’t lecture *to* Corporate America…
they lecture *on behalf of* them.
This is the truth of the Cult of President Trump. More than just a gang of thuggish
self-important people throwing their weight around and calling it “winning”,
it’s an old elitist mindset that says: “We deserve to be where we are and it’s
really your own fault that we made you where you are and you just have to work
harder at staying there and not complain about it.”
Because if you’re spending every waking day and every waking moment of
your life working just to make ends meet and to keep other people happy, then
you really don’t have the time to complain about it, do you?
Monday, May 22, 2017
Week of 05/22/2017
Impeachment
Fantasies Versus Political Reality
– by David Matthews 2
– by David Matthews 2
In the Oliver Stone movie “Nixon”, Paul Sorvino’s Henry Kissinger laments
on President Richard Nixon’s troubles prior to his resignation from
office. With impeachment threats
becoming more and more real, Kissinger speculated that Nixon was who he was
because he wasn’t loved by the people he needed the most.
“Imagine what he would have been like had anyone ever loved him”, he said.
I keep that particular scene in mind when it comes to separating Nixon
from our current elected leader.
Donald J. Trump, our orange-skinned-wacky-man in the White House, has
been in office not even half-a-year as of this column’s posting date, and
people are not only spinning fantasies of removing him from office, but are
even getting used to saying the words “President Mike Pence” and are trying to
convince themselves that our current Vice President would somehow be better for
the country than ol’ Orange Stain. Hell,
even the Vice-President has
started his own Super PAC to prepare for it!
Every day the media and the Internet bring some new headline, some twist
and turn involving Trump or the people connected to him, and the liberals and
progressives and the rest of the anti-Trump crowd cheer and say “This is it!
This is the final straw that will break the man-child’s back! He’s done!
He’s finished! This will get him
impeached and out of office!”
And people complain that pornography is unrealistic!
I can understand when conservatives and neo-conservatives and the rest of
the red-hat freedom-hating fascists did it with President Obama for eight years;
spinning delusional fantasy after delusional fantasy that they could somehow
undo his election. These are the same
folks that watch professional wrestling and think that it’s real. That explains how Trump can appoint Linda
McMahon of World Wrestling Entertainment as head of the Small Business
Administration and nobody batted an eyelash over it.
But, liberals? Progressives? Free-thinking people? I expected more from you! I mean, you guys are supposed to be the smart
ones in the bunch! You’re supposed to be
the intellectuals! What the hell are you
doing jumping at clickbait headlines and acting like a bunch of red-hats when
it comes to Trump stuff?
Yes, the actual “fake news” people who made their money off the sheer
stupidity and extreme confirmation bias of the Trumpets are back and they’re
finally able to make money off the liberals and progressives now that Trump is in
the White House. They couldn’t before,
when it was believed that Hillary Clinton would win. They tried.
They really tried, but they said that you liberals and progressives just
didn’t take their bait. You were supposedly
“too smart” for them!
But now that our Narcissist-in-Chief is in the Oval Office, the liberals
and progressives are clicking away at their clickbait headlines, eager to get
any kind of reassurance that Trumpaconallus will be impeached and/or indicted
and/or hoisted from his Twitter petard and sent packing to Mar-a-Largo for good.
Why, liberals? Why,
progressives? Why do this? Why indulge yourselves in these poli-porn
fantasies?
Let’s get really, really, brutally honest here...
None of what you have seen or heard so far will get President Donald
Trump impeached anytime soon. At
all. Even with a special
council appointed to investigate Trump’s possible connections to
Russia. Even with now-former FBI
Director James Comey talking
with members of the U.S. Senate and willing to testify in open hearings. And even if former National Security advisor
Michael Flynn sang like Beyoncé over what he knows, it still would not result
in impeachment, never mind indictment, never mind getting any nearer to getting
Trumpaconallus removed from office.
Why? Because politics.
In order for the Congress of the United States to impeach Trump, the
House of Representatives must bring up articles of impeachment, which they must
actually vote on and pass. Then they
have to go to the U.S. Senate for a special trial presided over by the United
States Supreme Court, where the senators have to vote to convict or acquit the
President with a two-thirds majority for conviction. Go ahead and look it up. It’s spelled out in the United States Constitution. We just went through all this twenty years
ago with your buddy, President Bill Clinton.
(And who would have thought that *he* would look
like a saint in comparison?)
I’ll remind you that the House of Representatives is currently under the
iron grip of the GOP and run by “Mister Budget”, Speaker Paul Ryan. They do not want to impeach
Trumpaconallus. At all. Ever.
Period.
I’ll also remind you that the United States Senate is currently under the
iron grip of the GOP and run by the slack-jawed turtle dick, Senate Majority
Leader Mitch “The Bitch” McConnell. They do not want to convict Trumpaconallus of
any articles of impeachment. At
all. Ever. Period.
None of them will ever want to do anything to remove Trump from office
because he represents all of those red-hat-wearing cult-like supporters that
they and their friends in talk radio and Fox News and Breitbart and the rest of
the conservative groups have been cultivating over the decades. They created the crowds that voted for Trump
and also keep themselves in power. Those
red-hat masses are the bumper crop of the seeds of discord that they sewed a
long time ago. To remove Trump is to go
against those masses, and you do not go against the cult that keeps you in
office.
I mean, you liberals should know all about that. Why the hell do you think Nancy Pelosi is
still around and still serving as
the bane of your faction’s collective political existence?
On top of that, the United States Supreme Court is being dominated by
conservative-leaning justices. They do
not want to do anything to challenge the status quo or upset the government. At all.
Period. The days of actual freedom-loving
justices like William O. Douglas are long since gone.
Remember when Trump made the campaign claim that he
could shoot someone in the middle of 5th Avenue and not lose a
single voter? For once, he was not
exaggerating about that! That actually
is a valid claim to make given what we know about his red-hat supporters!
But the scary part is that the same holds true to those in Washington now
that he is the government. At this
point, Donald Trump could hypothetically have a dead hooker in the Lincoln
Bedroom and hypothetically be found with blood on his clothes and be hypothetically
holding the bloody knife in his hand and those in Washington will do everything
in their power to excuse, justify, and validate it. And it wouldn’t be because they like him or
because they think he’s some kind of political savior. They
would do it because that is the nature of politics.
The impeachment poli-porn fantasies all rely on the members of the GOP
suddenly “coming to their senses” and deciding that enough is enough. It presumes that “Mister Budget” and “Mitch
The Bitch” would actually “keep Trump in check” like they promised in 2016 when
they first pledged to support him as their party’s nominee. I would have a far better chance of spending
the night with my favorite muse than to see the GOP leaders suddenly hold themselves
true to their word.
Yes, Nixon resigned rather than be impeached, but that was because Nixon
was a political creature and the people in charge of Congress were
Democrats. In other words,
politics. Plus Nixon was legitimately
concerned about the nation and how it would handle such a divisive subject. That’s actually a rare trait that we don’t
see in today’s politicians Bill Clinton
was actually impeached because the GOP was in charge of the Congress so they just
needed an excuse. Again, politics.
Donald Trump, on the other hand, lives in his own narcissistic world of
alternative facts, surrounded by myrmidons and soothsayers, with a political party
that enables him and a dedicated group of red-hat-wearing cult members that
live in that same alternative reality. Again,
politics. And there is nothing at all to
suggest that the GOP is willing to go against him, no matter what he does short
of trying launch an all-out nuclear war.
Because, you know, it’s hard to govern a nation when it has become a
nuclear wasteland.
That brings us to that “other option” as provided in section
four of the 25th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. It’s a little confusing, but basically it
gives a way out for Pence and the rest of the Trump lackeys to nudge Trump out
of the way without an all-out coup d’état or having to go through the enablers
in the GOP-controlled Congress. It also
presumes that Trump would have to be so deranged that nobody has any confidence
in him anymore. I’m not saying that it is
not a possibility, but I will say that Trump will have to do something so
extreme that his acolytes would have no choice but to invoke that option in
order to save the world, and so far they’ve been keeping him from going that
far. I mean we’re talking
“finger-on-the-button-screw-it-I’m-nuking-the-whole-world” extreme.
So my message to the impotent Dems and the liberals and progressives and
free-thinkers and other anti-Trump people is this: Stay frosty. Stay on point. Don’t indulge in the poli-porn
fantasies. Certainly don’t fall into the
clickbait traps. Don’t presume that
every twist and turn in our ongoing real-world soap opera “As The Trump Tweets”
will lead to your much-desired reward.
Soap operas instinctively detest happy endings, especially when it comes
to the real-world variety.
Donald Trump is not Richard Nixon.
He isn’t even Bill Clinton. He is
surrounded by enablers, not opponents, and they will not help you in the least. And as long as you engage in those poli-porn
fantasies of impeachment being “right around the corner”, then Trump will be
staying right where he is at least until 2021, if not 2025. That’s a really long time to live in
delusion.
The movie version of Kissinger wondered what Nixon would have been like
if was loved. Well, now we sort of know
the answer to that. He’d probably be like
Donald J. Trump.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)