Monday, April 27, 2015
Week of 04/27/2015
Were They Really That Decent?
The news is shocking.
Damnably shocking.
The Federal Bureau of Investigation, the supposed “top cops” of “top
cops” in America, the “best of the best of the best”, recently
admitted – albeit ashamedly – that their DNA hair analysis procedure was
not only flawed, it was rigged. And not
just in one or two instances, but in almost three hundred trials in over two
decades. We’re talking cases going all
the way back to the 1970’s!
Thirty-two of those cases resulted in death penalty convictions, with
fourteen of them already executed. In
other words, fourteen people were executed on behalf of rigged testimony. Were they innocent? We’ll never know.
The FBI’s lab and their workers were supposedly “the” best in the
world. “Best” because it supposedly gave
definitive answers. They were the
original “CSI”. Now we find out that for
at least two decades, it was used as a rigged tool of the prosecution in 96% of
instances.
While this shocking revelation was hitting the wires, the FBI was also trying
to explain their actions when it came to the investigation of former
General David Petraeus on the charge of divulging classified secrets. At issue was how one of the victims of the
case, Jill Kelley, was being interviewed for being cyberstalked. Although it would eventually lead to the
admission that the former “Iraq War Surge” general was engaging in an affair
and divulging secrets to his mistress during that affair, there were alleged
efforts by the FBI to bury the whole matter by attacking the witness.
Former judge Andrew Napolitano published
an article thanks to his friends in the Koch-owned Reason Foundation to
talk about the abuses of power the FBI has engaged in, including sabotaging
hotel cable in order to wiretap an alleged illegal gambler in – of all places –
Las Vegas. He talked about how the FBI
used to have “integrity”, but now apparently they don’t.
And the first thought that came through my mind is...
Were they really that good and decent?
Really?
I’m not kidding here.
Remember the abuses conducted under orders of the late J. Edgar Hoover? Hoover used
to investigate anyone and everyone he deemed to be “a threat”, which
included people like Elvis Presley, Albert Einstein, and Dr. Martin Luther King
Jr. In fact Hoover supposedly had so
many “secrets” that he could never be fired simply because nobody higher up
knew what he had on them.
The website Listverse came up with 10 “unnerving
secrets” of the FBI, which included helping brutal mobsters commit crimes,
framing innocent people, and even taking part in the explosive confrontation between
law enforcement and the group known as MOVE in 1985. And by “explosive” I mean with literal bombs
being dropped on people.
And this is the agency that is supposed to be “decent” and have “integrity”?
So, again, I have to question if they are as “decent” as Judge
Napolitano claimed they once were. Or was
that simply media hype and clever PR combined with addled minds longing for
better years?
Bear in mind that I’m not saying the FBI is rotten to the core or that
every agent is evil. I’m not pulling a
page out of “Captain America: The Winter Soldier” and saying the whole thing
has to go. But I do have to question the
idea that any law enforcement group is – by default – good and decent and has
all of our best intentions.
I remember the horror stories my father used to tell me about the
police when grew up in Cleveland. He
used to tell me repeated that “if a cop saw you out after dark, he’d beat the
crap out of you and send you home. And
if you told your parents about it, they’d beat you up twice as bad!”
Now is that the kind of story that generates trust for police officers
and law enforcement in general?
And bear I mind that my father was both a state and local police
officer!
To make things worse, we
have video of police officers shooting unarmed people in the back. We have video of police officers engaged in
blatant choke-holds and getting away with it.
We have video of police officers going after people for simply
video-recording them doing their jobs.
We have video of police officers running over suspects with their squad
car like they were playing “Grand Theft Auto” or “Carmageddon”. We have acts
of brutality from our supposed “protectors” and “public servants” that would
fall under the category of war crimes if they were carried out in any other
country, all of which are shown on the nightly news before eventually being swept
under the rug with little or no accountability.
Does this mean that the police are corrupt to the core? Does it mean that there is suddenly absence
of right and wrong when it comes to our law enforcement? Does it mean that every cop is simply a
criminal with a badge and a “Double-O” license to kill?
No. It doesn’t.
But let’s get brutally honest here... what we are seeing are the “bad
apples” being exposed thanks in no small part to courageous citizens armed with
the latest in technology.
All of these recent incidences are coming to light as they are
happening because more and more people have cameras with them. If they’re not recording their lives with
GoPro camcorders, then they’re carrying around cellphones and tablets that have
digital cameras build in and the means to upload those videos quickly in ways
that police cannot destroy by
simply smashing the device.
What doesn’t help is when those in government follow their instincts
and protect their own even when the proof is damnable and very public. The so-called “Department of Justice” cannot
live up to their own name if they continually whitewash police abuses. All of the claims of “training” and being “certified”
mean absolutely squat if some good-old-boy Goober with political connections
can seemingly buy his badge and buy a “pass” through all of that training, as
is being revealed in Tulsa County, Oklahoma.
And if you think it all can be swept under the rug, then you have
another thing coming. You think the
protests last year over Ferguson were bad?
If you want the protests to get worse, all you have to do is keep doing
nothing and hiding your heads in both the sand and in phony nostalgia.
We all want to believe that the institutions we trust with our security
do so with “integrity” and “decency”.
But if they can’t honestly live up to those standards, then we do
ourselves a greater injustice by trying to pretend that these either exist or
existed then. It is high time that we
took off the rose-colored spectacles our past and recognize that things weren’t
as “good” and “pure” as we pretended they were, because that is the only way that
we can move forward and actually make things better.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment