Monday, August 8, 2022

Week of 08/08/2022

Making Liars Pay

There’s a big misnomer when it comes to both the Internet and free speech and that is that you can say or do or show whatever you want without consequence.

As a long-time supporter and defender of free speech, especially on the Internet, I know that this is not true.  There are some things that you can’t say or do or show online.  Certainly when it comes to the online providers, it’s up to whatever standards they want to set as part of their Terms of Service.  But, in a general sense, you can’t show clearly obscene things.  Things involving kids.  Things involving illegal drugs or weapons of mass destruction.  And you supposedly can’t use the Internet to incite riots or insurrection.

Conservatives, especially conservative and fascist extremists, have long used traditional and online media to push the boundaries.  Some, like the late Rush Limbaugh, have excused their antics as being “entertainment” or claiming to be a “comedian” like the equally late George Carlin.  The difference being George Carlin was a genuine comedian, who used real-world hypocrisies for a laugh but still made a serious point about them.  When I watch Carlin on HBO, I’m not expecting him to advance a political cause or a candidate for office or to debate his critics.

On the other hand, Limbaugh and his friends and successors are just agitators using supposed comedic gaffes to advance their agenda.  And I say that not only as someone who was listening their sputum for decades, but as someone who was an online radio personality.  I know the power of using comedy and parody to influence your audience.

And then there is Alex Jones.

Like the late Lyndon LaRouche, Alex Jones is full of conspiracies.  His biggest claim to fame is his belief that the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 were an “inside job” to justify America going to war against the world.  But that’s just one of his many conspiracy theories that he’s bantered about over the years.

His more horrific conspiracy theories, and the most damaging, involve the victims of mass shootings.

Apparently Mister Jones has said that the shootings in places like the Sandy Hook Elementary School and Spellman Douglas High School were “staged” and that “nobody died” and that the victims, survivors, and/or parents of those killed were  all “crisis actors”.

I want you to think about that for a moment.  Imagine a parent having to go through what they would consider the unthinkable, only to have some blowhard with a bad beard call their child and possibly you to be a “crisis actor” playing a hoax.  Your terrible loss being treated as “a hoax”.  And all to sell supplements.

Worse yet, Mister Jones has listeners who buy into his conspiracies and have harassed those parents.  One such listener did so with repeated death threats that later ended with her going to prison.

Remember the Comet Ping Pong “Pizzagate” mess?  The guy who traveled across state lines to show up at that pizzeria with a rifle to supposedly “liberate children” from a basement that did not exist was a listener of Alex Jones, who also stirred that conspiracy up as well.  He didn’t create it, supposedly, but he certainly pushed it just the same.  Oh, and then Jones allegedly said that the shooter was also part of that conspiracy.

So... you know what the provocateurs say, right?  If they’re lying, take them to court.

They did.  Two parents of a child killed in the Sandy Hook massacre sued Alex Jones and Infowars.  Alex Jones was found guilty by default, because Jones apparently refused to provide required documents and was playing games with the legal proceedings.

So now Jones was hit with $4.1 million in compensatory damages and $45.2 million in punitive damages for his big mouth and his asinine legal games.  He also has to pay $1.5 million for lawyer fees because of said legal games. 

And that is just one of many legal cases that he has to deal with because of his reckless antics.  He has a lot more to go through, and this judgement will no doubt be used as evidence in all the other lawsuits he is still facing.

Let’s get brutally honest here... Alex Jones has nobody to blame for his situation but himself.  He chose to keep talking and running his mouth in his little media service.  He chose to target parents and the victims of tragedies and accuse them of being part of some “deep state” hoax.  He chose to play games with the legal proceedings, which resulted in the default judgement against him.  This is all on him.

He’s not the only one that needs to be held to account for lies, of course.  There are a few attorneys representing a certain orange-skinned narcissist who used to be the President of the United States who have been slinging lies and conspiracies as well, and they’re getting hit with lawsuits.  A few so-called “news” services and even a pillow businessman that support said orange-skinned narcissist have also been hit with lawsuits because it is “advantageous” for them to support him and regurgitate those lies.

Then there is the orange-skinned narcissist, who firmly believes that he has “absolute immunity” from all accountability in pretty much everything he says, whether it’s about the January 6th insurrection or what he said about a woman who accused him of sexual assault or a former contestant of “The Apprentice”.  He just can’t seem to stop running his mouth, and he still believes he cannot be touched.

And yet, they all need to be held to account.  All of them.  That is how it works.  The provocateurs always say that if they’re lying, then take them to court.  That is what is happening.

Freedom of speech does not give you the freedom to slander or libel someone, be it to help sell supplements, advance a political agenda, stay in office, or to soothe one’s fragile ego.  It doesn’t give you the freedom to invoke panic or violence or terroristic threats via your listeners.  We condemn it when done by religious extremist on the other side of the planet.  The same needs to apply here in America. 

As one lawyer recently said: “speech is free, but lies you have to pay for.”

Monday, August 1, 2022

Week of 08/01/2022 - Mental Health Break Extended

 

Due to forces beyond his control, David 2 has had to extend his mental health break one more week.

He should have a new article next week.  Hopefully.

Monday, July 25, 2022

Week of 07/25/2022 - Mental Health Break

The commentator will be taking a mental health break from the column for this week.

He should have a new article next week.

Monday, July 18, 2022

Week of 07/18/2022

 

Musk Versus Twitter: Let It Die

There’s a lot that can be said about Elon Musk, and not all of it good.

His space race against Jeff Bezos has been good in that it provides America with a way back into space after the screwjob with NASA.  His self-driving electric Tesla vehicle?  Well the jury is still out on that.

His managerial style is more reminiscent of the industrialists of the 19th century, especially when it comes to using certain members of the office staff for... ahem... “personal matters”.  And his family matters are supposedly a dumpster fire that makes the HBO series “Succession” look downright tame.  His father supposedly had babies with his stepsister, and what a piece of work he apparently is!  His own daughter is supposedly changing her name to divorce herself from him.  And he’s now in a pissing contest with an even bigger dumpster fire that goes by the last name of Trump.  And that’s not the only pissing contest he's engaged in.

And then there is Twitter.

Now, full disclosure... even though I have in the past (and the present) deride Twitter users, I have to include myself among them.  Yes, I am a Twit.  I use it for personal and professional purposes.  So I have a stake in the continued use of the service, even if it is simply as a user.

Now Musk decided he wanted to buy Twitter this past April.  He bought shares and supposedly promised to buy Twitter and “take it private” after whining about Twitter blocking people like a certain orange dumpster fire.  He then raised enough money (in other words, he took out loans) to make a complete buy-out for $43 billion.

Then he whined about “bots” and “fake accounts” and said he can’t go through with the deal because Twitter supposedly “wasn’t cooperating”.  So he’s taking his billions and walking away.

Not so, says Twitter execs, who are now filing lawsuits to force the deal through.

So now the idiots in the media are whining about Musk supposedly being forced to go through with the deal and what that would entail and whether or not a court could force someone to continue with a financial transaction that they no longer want.  If you start the process of buying a car and then back out, could the dealer take you to court to force you to buy it?  That’s essentially what is being argued by the idiots in the media.

Let’s get a few things straight...

First, Musk is wrong in his idea that Twitter is some First Amendment “free speech forum”.  Twitter is a private company, not a public medium.  The Internet is a public medium, and Twitter is not the Internet.  As such, Twitter has every right to make rules about how its users use the service, just like Facebook and Google and Yahoo and all the others.  If they say you don’t spread misinformation about pandemics and vaccines, then you don’t.  If they say you don’t say something to incite a riot or start an insurrection, then you don’t.  And if you do that stuff, then they have every right to ban and bar you from that service. 

It's called “terms of service”, something that Musk should know about.

People don’t have a “right” to use Twitter.  They have permission as long as they abide by its rules.  To say that people have a “right” to use Twitter, no matter the message, no matter the content, is to nationalize the service.  It would be no different than people just taking Musk’s Tesla vehicles off the lots and claim they have a “right” to them because the roads are considered “public”.

Now let’s talk about the deal.

This commentator is of the speculation that the idea of buying out Twitter was more of a “rich people” thing than some genuine concern for the business.  Rich person gets offended, they buy out the thing that offended them as revenge.  Batman’s alter ego Bruce Wayne is notorious for this sort of stuff.  Elon Musk was slapped down for the stuff he tweeted about, he buys Twitter so they wouldn’t do that to him again.  And then he adds in the orange dumpster fire and his acolytes just for good measure so he could claim it wasn’t just about him.  Or... that’s the speculation.

The thing about bots and fake accounts?  Do you honestly think that Twitter is the only service that has that problem?  Instagram, Discord, Facebook... the whole Internet is rife with bots and fakes.  And no matter how much you try to weed them out, they come back like the mythical Hydra, and in greater numbers.  Whine about bots, Mister Musk?  Might as well whine about potholes interfering with your precious Tesla cars.  Or space junk threatening your Starlink satellites in orbit.

There is really only one reason why Musk would be concerned about bots and fake accounts, and that would be if he wanted to turn all users into paying subscribers.  You can’t get money from a fake account.

As to whether or not Musk would be forced by the courts to follow through with the purchase of Twitter, I would hope that this is not what the lawsuit would really be about.  As mentioned before, it would be like you or I going to a car dealership, backing out of the sale before the final signing, and have the dealership suing us to go through with the purchase anyway.  That just doesn’t make sense.

I would hope that the lawsuit would be to force Musk to abide by the stipulation in the initial agreement that he would have to pay $1 billion if the deal fell through.  Doing so would certainly cement the failure of the deal.  Musk should not be able to just walk away scot-free after all the hassle and media drama we’ve all been put through, not just my fellow Twitter Twits and the Twit investors.

There are some speculations about this as well.  Certainly saying the deal is off has caused Twitter’s stock value to collapse.  That means it’s overall worth is less than the price Musk wanted to buy it for.  One can easily see Musk wanting to re-negotiate for the lower price and credit himself for being a “master dealer-maker”.  If so, I think the Securities and Exchange Commission would like to have a word about that.

Someone else once speculated that Musk never really wanted to buy Twitter at all, but used the purchase to lighten his load of Tesla stock, since it was used to make the purchase.  Sell some stock for liquidity, cancel the buyout, and keep the money and not be burdened by Tesla stock.

Again, these are all theories and speculations.  But, either way, this looks bad for Musk and screws Twitter investors.

If I were the judge, I would make it simple for Musk and Twitter: either go through with the acquisition for the price that you offered, or fork over the $1 billion as per the agreement and not only walk away, but be barred from ever holding stock or talk of acquiring Twitter ever again.  Because let’s get brutally honest here... the amount of BS being tossed about concerning this service is unacceptable and needs to end.

You don’t like Twitter doing what they do?  Then follow the lead of the orange dumpster fire and create your own.  Before Facebook, there was MySpace.  Before MySpace, there was Prodigy and CompuServe and America Online.  Yahoo used to be the only search engine and now there’s Google, Bing, and Duck Duck Go.  These came about because real businessmen, real inventors, real entrepreneurs don’t play games with the biggest services.  They create competition and beat them at their own game.  That’s something that Musk should have done instead of letting his ego guide him.

If you really don’t want to buy Twitter anymore, Mister Musk, then pay the billion and let the deal die.  It is that simple for a supposed “smart businessman” to comprehend.