Monday, March 11, 2019

Week fo 03/11/2019


The National Debt Bludgeon
Picture this scene in your local big box store...
A man and a woman are shopping with their kids.  They have a long list of things to get but little money.  They have a credit card, but with a high interest rate and huge debt that they really don’t want to add to, and a hard time keeping up the payments.
The first place they go to is the clothing department.  The kids need new clothes, but the father continually nixes everything the kids want to get because it’s “just too expensive”.  The mother says the kids need new clothes, but the father says that they can make do with what they have.  Just sew up the holes.  The mother says they can’t because the clothes are so worn, they can’t be sewed back.  The father eventually relents but limits the number of clothes they buy to the cheapest.  And, he says, there’s always Goodwill.
They pass by the electronics department, and the kids say they need the latest game, but both parents say no, because paying $60 for a game they’ll get tired of in a week isn’t worth the cost.  They do point to the cheap retro games, but the kids think they’re lame.  The family doesn’t even dare go near the toy department, much to the protesting of the kids.
The automotive department brings a little drama, as the father says they need to change the oil on their pickup, but the mother wonders why he “needs” the most expensive brand.  He also looks at new shiny rims, but the mother immediately says no.
They finally get to the grocery department, and here the battle begins.  They need food.  But the father doesn’t want them to get anything because it is all “too expensive”.  Why drink fruit juice when there’s water from the tap?  The dog deserves good food, but not the pricy stuff.  Besides, the dog eats their table scraps anyway.  Why buy chopped steak when there’s microwave food in the freezer section?  Bread?  Milk?  There’s a food pantry they can go visit.
In the end, they get just enough, but far from what they need, and the father complains all the way home about the price of things and how hard it will be to pay the bills and the credit card debt, which they had to add to.  But, later that evening, the father does come back from the store for “something he forgot”; namely ammo and beer and munchies for his regular weekend hunting trip with his friends.  Not to mention some munchies for the kids so they won’t tell their mother.  Oh, and he did get that premium motor oil for his truck along with a snarky new bumper sticker.  All of which also went on that credit card that he previously complained about.
That, my friends and dear readers, is our nation.
Let’s get a few things out of the way.  Yes, we have a huge problem with the national debt.  And the deficit.  And we’re spending more and more money on paying the interest on the debt because we keep blowing it up.  We wouldn’t know how to spend within our means even if we were forced to.  And we can’t now. 
Our debt is so astronomically high, we will never be able to pay it off.  Ever.  The only way out of it would be a civilization-ending event.  Maybe that’s real reason why the conservatives are so hell-bent on ruining the planet for the rest of us.
And yet, even if we accept the problem, we refuse to truly take responsibility for it.
I have noticed that the only time… the *only* time… that the conservatives recognize the multi-trillion-dollar debt is when a Democrat is in the White House, or when someone proposes a federal project that does not involve guns, cops, prisons, or war.  There are conservative so-called “experts” from so-called think tank groups that spew never-ending rants in all the newspapers about how bad the debt is and how it is crippling America and how we need to stop spending money completely in order to deal with the problem.  They spew those articles out like bulimics with a gallon of ipecac anytime there’s talk about spending for infrastructure, or for foreign aid, or for Medicaid and Medicare, or education, or to fix the healthcare problem.  Oh, we supposedly can’t even begin to think about those things because of the debt!  But when it comes to bombs, bullets, tanks, prisons, they’re painfully silent.  No amount is too great to spend for those things.
The GOP had no qualms about spending for unlimited war when President George W. Bush was in the White House and they were in charge of the purse strings.  Every program they wanted went through with no worry at all about the deficit or the debt.  Wage unlimited war around the world?  Go for it!  We’ll settle up later.  It’s only when they lost control of the Congress in 2007 did they start talking about the debt that they themselves had amassed and then blamed on the Democrats. 
The GOP screamed like children throwing a class-4 tantrum in the Walmart for every day that President Barack Obama was in the White House.  Everything was about the debt!  Everything!  We could no longer “pay” for the very wars they themselves created.  We could no longer pay for the very programs they had no problem paying for previously.  Hell, they shut down the government several times over it!  They screamed and shrieked and stamped their feet and threatened to hold their breath until their hypocritical faces turned blue over the debt that they themselves helped expand.
And then… crickets... when their new lord and savior, Narcissist Donald Trump, inhabited the White House.  For two years, no talk about debt or deficits. No talk about how we can afford to pay for things as the GOP handed out tax cuts and tax breaks to corporations and wealthy Americans.  No talk about debt ceilings.  Trump starts trade wars with China and then eagerly pledges billions in federal handouts to American farmers for compensation, and nobody in the GOP raises even an eyebrow!
And let’s not forget Narcissist Trump’s ego-wall.  A monument to his overinflated ego that costs billions and billions more than he asks, and he continually asks for more and more.  Oh, and it is an ego-wall that he repeatedly promised that Mexico would pay for but now he demands that the American taxpayers pay for.
It’s only now, when the GOP loses control of the House and the financial purse-strings, do they start talking about debt and deficits again.  These supposed “masters” of fiscal responsibility that only seem to recognize there’s a problem when they are not the ones in power.
That’s not taking responsibility.  That’s using the debt as a political weapon.  A political cudgel by which conservatives wield for their own exclusive use.  No different than that abusive father who uses the family’s money as a weapon to deprive his family of the essentials while allowing him to buy luxuries.
Let’s get brutally honest here... we can never start to be responsible with America’s financial problems as long as they are used as a weapon for one political faction over the rest of the nation.  Yes, the debt is a problem.  But we also cannot just stop federal spending.  There are programs that need to be funded.  Services that must go on.  Employees and contractors that must be paid.  Contrary to the Narcissistic President’s business practices, you can’t expect those folks to work for free.
The conservatives and the GOP as a party – a party that this commentator used to be a card-carrying member of – have long forfeited any legitimate claim of being fiscally responsible through their hypocritical use of the debt as a weapon.  You don’t wage unlimited war worldwide, you don’t provoke war worldwide, you don’t hand out tax breaks and tax cuts to the millionaires and billionaires and provoke trade wars, you don’t shoot up the debt to where it is today, and then turn around and blame everyone but yourselves for it. If there is any faction in the world that should be made to sit out of all future dealings with the debt, it’s them.
By the way, it should be noted that Narcissist Trump’s trade war with China and his demand for an ego-wall along the border with Mexico are actually threatening two of the three largest purchasers of our debt.  Do we really want to see what happens if they decide to abruptly cash in on the notes they have?  Or, worse yet, not buy any more?  We’ve seen what happens when the banks do it to ordinary Americans.  They did it with glee just ten years ago and millions of Americans suffered for it.  Do you want to try it on the national scale?
The hypothetical abusive father who lords over the family finances and racks up the debt can only go so far before forces beyond his control step in and put an end to it.  He plays a dangerous game, but, at least with him, it’s just his family that bears the brunt of that folly.  It’s not the whole neighborhood.  Or, for that matter, the whole nation.

Monday, March 4, 2019

Week of 03/04/2019


The Actual Fake News
America’s orange-skinned narcissist, President Donald Trump, loves to throw about the term “fake news” to dismiss anything that criticizes him or disagrees with him or his policies.  Fact-checking, for instance, is “fake news”.  Reporters that question or criticize him are “fake news”.  CNN, MSNBC, NBC, the Washington Post, are all part of the so-called “fake news media”.  Truth, fact, reality, if they contradict Trump or question him or even make him look bad, they’re all “fake news”.  Only Trump is truth in the minds of his base.
Ironically, Trump’s biggest supporters are propaganda mills and tabloid services.  Places that spread lies and juicy gossip with full-color splashes that are so absurd that they don’t have to apologize when exposed.  Instead, they double-down even harder on the lies and rumors.  Those, he considers to be “truth”, while the truth is condemned as being “fake”.
Unfortunately, Trump’s nonsensical term “fake news” does a far greater disservice with society, because it makes it difficult to identify and crack down on the articles that are treated as “news” that really aren’t.
Every day I check my news feed through Google, which brings me articles from all sorts of different sources.  But, because I put in comic books and science fiction as some of the topics to look for, I get hit with all sorts of non-news articles.  And, no, I’m not talking advertisements.  I’m talking fictional stories passed off as “news” articles.
For instance, since when did “fan theories” become news articles?
A website called “BGR”, aka “Boy Genius Reports”, which claims to be an “online destination for news and commentary focused on the mobile and consumer market”, touted a big headline banner that says “Mindblowing ‘Avengers: Endgame’ Theory Says Thanos Really Didn’t Kill Anyone With The Snap”.  You know, that gut-wrenching scene at the end of “Avengers: Infinity War” where – spoilers – Thanos won and the heroes lost and we watch people literally disintegrate in front of us.  “Boy Genius” wants us to know that, according to a “fan theory”, that really didn’t happen.
Whether or not it is true we will never know until “Avengers: Endgame” comes out in about one month after this column posts.  But for right now, it’s just a theory.  From a fan. 
And BGR considers that to be “news”.  And, because BGR considers that to be as much “news” as the latest game release or tech product recall, Google then assumes it to be news as well, so it ends up in my news feed.
The problem is that it is not news.  It is wishful fantasy.  From “a fan”.  It’s no different than saying that the Los Angeles Rams should have been Super Bowl LIII Champions because some football fan “predicted” it and laid out some complex play-by-play scenario where they would prevail.  The problem is that they didn’t win.  The Rams weren’t champions. The New England Patriots won it 13-3.  So the story is just fiction.
“Fan Castings” are another kind of so-called “news story” that wrongly appears in my news feed.  Much like the “fan theory” story, so-called “entertainment” services try to play casting director to movies that have yet to be made.
For instance… CBR or “Comic Book Resources”, a mainstay for comic book and comic book-related news, put this headline in their feed: “Batman Begins Again: Who Will Play The Dark Knight?”  The article is then followed by the actors that they feel would be “better” at playing Batman than Ben Affleck was.
The problem is this… they’re not casting directors.  This is not “news”.  It is, again, a fan theory.  It is fantasy.  It is no different than the folks at comicbook.com who re-imagined “Thor” star Chris Hemsworth as Aquaman.  Again, this is not news.  This is fantasy.
So why the hell is this crap in my news feed?
The problem is that fan theories and fantasy castings and other stories that pretend to be “news” have been causing real problems for the entertainment world.
Long before the news came out that Warner Brothers gave up on having Ben Affleck continue playing Batman, so-called “news articles” were announcing the demise of Affleck’s caped crusader.  Same with Henry Cavil’s role as Superman.  Were they just “too soon”?  Or were they goading the WB execs into doing it?  The CW, owned by Warner Brothers. is besieged with rumors about killing off Green Arrow and Supergirl in the forthcoming “Crisis on Infinite Earths” event, which will air sometime this fall, even though both shows were just quickly renewed for the 2019-2020 season.
Even before the news came out that Peter Capaldi would retire as BBC’s “Doctor Who”, fan theories and fantasy casting articles were out looking to not only replace him, but to recast the titular character as a woman.  Did that influence BBC execs in their eventual decision to give the title to Jodi Whittaker?  Was that the reason why Capaldi stepped down?  What sort of shows could we have gotten from that series if not for the deluge of fiction passed off as “news”?
And it’s not just the entertainment section afflicted with this garbage.  My business news feed catches the occasional “breaking news” about some future merger that exists only in the mind of some “speculator”.  Or the “warning” of some financial catastrophe if people don’t make some kind of financial decision that smacks more of a commercial than a “news article”. 
And politics?  Oh the fantasy stories churn out almost as fast as Trump’s lies about who is “about” to run for president in 2020 and who is “likely” to win.    The so-called “political experts” and their polling data – all of which should have been fired after the 2016 fraud – are already trying to manipulate the 2020 elections before the Russians can do it. 
All of these are considered “news” according to Google, so they end up in my news feed.
Let’s get brutally honest here... as long as news services continue to churn out fictional stories and pass them off as “news”, it is difficult, if not impossible to counter the lies and propaganda from Narcissist Trump and his red-hat supporters, never mind refute claims of “fake news”.  Because, guess what?  It’s there!  There is fiction being passed off as “news”, and not just from lazy so-called “journalists” like Stephen Glass or Jayson Blair.
Now I can understand why websites like CBR and BGR pass off the fraud of fan theories and fantasy castings as “news articles”.  It’s all about the “clicks” to them.  It’s about getting the attention of readers so they will visit the website and get the ad revenue.  But it also takes away space from the really important stories.  The stuff that we really should be informed about.
And, yeah, I get it.  Sometimes the studios aren’t that responsive about upcoming movies and TV shows.  They have a schedule about how much information to share before the “big release”, and people just don’t want to wait.  Certainly the websites that rely on those “clicks” can’t afford to be patient.
But the actual news services?  The ones that pride themselves in their “journalistic integrity”?  They really have no excuse.  If anything, they actually help Trump and his enablers.  They give credence to Trump’s claim of “fake news”.  How can they be trusted if they spread fiction masquerading as “news”?  Even if it’s for “clicks”, it’s still not right.
The news services have a responsibility to the public in that the information they present is factual and honest.  It is as important to them as fidelity is to a marriage.  When that trust is broken, it’s hard to rebuild it.  This not a call for legislation or regulation, because this is something that the government cannot fix.  Rather, this is a call for the news services and those that put them in our news feed to clean up their act.   There is no place for “fan theories”, fantasy castings, daily polls, or political or business “speculations” in a news service or a news feed.
You can’t counter Trump’s “fake news” slur by simply saying that you’re not.  You counter it with facts, integrity, honesty, and the truth.  And that can’t be a “sometime” thing as long as ratings or readership or “clicks” allow it.  That’s truly the difference between the news that we want to trust and the tabloids that Trump and his ilk seem to prefer.