Monday, March 11, 2019
Week fo 03/11/2019
The
National Debt Bludgeon
Picture this scene in your local big box store...
A man and a woman are shopping with their kids. They have a long list of things to get but
little money. They have a credit card,
but with a high interest rate and huge debt that they really don’t want to add
to, and a hard time keeping up the payments.
The first place they go to is the clothing department. The kids need new clothes, but the father
continually nixes everything the kids want to get because it’s “just too
expensive”. The mother says the kids
need new clothes, but the father says that they can make do with what they
have. Just sew up the holes. The mother says they can’t because the
clothes are so worn, they can’t be sewed back.
The father eventually relents but limits the number of clothes they buy
to the cheapest. And, he says, there’s
always Goodwill.
They pass by the electronics department, and the kids say they need the
latest game, but both parents say no, because paying $60 for a game they’ll get
tired of in a week isn’t worth the cost.
They do point to the cheap retro games, but the kids think they’re
lame. The family doesn’t even dare go
near the toy department, much to the protesting of the kids.
The automotive department brings a little drama, as the father says they
need to change the oil on their pickup, but the mother wonders why he “needs”
the most expensive brand. He also looks
at new shiny rims, but the mother immediately says no.
They finally get to the grocery department, and here the battle begins. They need food. But the father doesn’t want them to get
anything because it is all “too expensive”.
Why drink fruit juice when there’s water from the tap? The dog deserves good food, but not the pricy
stuff. Besides, the dog eats their table
scraps anyway. Why buy chopped steak
when there’s microwave food in the freezer section? Bread?
Milk? There’s a food pantry they
can go visit.
In the end, they get just enough, but far from what they need, and the
father complains all the way home about the price of things and how hard it
will be to pay the bills and the credit card debt, which they had to add
to. But, later that evening, the father
does come back from the store for “something he forgot”; namely ammo and beer
and munchies for his regular weekend hunting trip with his friends. Not to mention some munchies for the kids so
they won’t tell their mother. Oh, and he
did get that premium motor oil for his truck along with a snarky new bumper
sticker. All of which also went on that
credit card that he previously complained about.
That, my friends and dear readers, is our nation.
Let’s get a few things out of the way.
Yes, we have a huge problem with the national debt. And the deficit. And we’re spending more and more money on
paying the interest on the debt because we keep blowing it up. We wouldn’t know how to spend within our
means even if we were forced to. And we
can’t now.
Our debt is so astronomically high, we will never be able to pay it
off. Ever. The only way out of it would be a civilization-ending
event. Maybe that’s real reason why the
conservatives are so hell-bent on ruining the planet for the rest of us.
And yet, even if we accept the problem, we refuse to truly take
responsibility for it.
I have noticed that the only time… the *only* time… that the
conservatives recognize the multi-trillion-dollar debt is when a Democrat is in
the White House, or when someone proposes a federal project that does not
involve guns, cops, prisons, or war.
There are conservative so-called “experts” from so-called think tank
groups that spew never-ending rants in all the newspapers about how bad the
debt is and how it is crippling America and how we need to stop spending money
completely in order to deal with the problem.
They spew those articles out like bulimics with a gallon of ipecac
anytime there’s talk about spending for infrastructure, or for foreign aid, or
for Medicaid and Medicare, or education, or to fix the healthcare problem. Oh, we supposedly can’t even begin to think
about those things because of the debt!
But when it comes to bombs, bullets, tanks, prisons, they’re painfully
silent. No amount is too great to spend
for those things.
The GOP had no qualms about spending for unlimited war when President
George W. Bush was in the White House and they were in charge of the purse
strings. Every program they wanted went
through with no worry at all about the deficit or the debt. Wage unlimited war around the world? Go for it!
We’ll settle up later. It’s only
when they lost control of the Congress in 2007 did they start talking about the
debt that they themselves had amassed and then blamed on the Democrats.
The GOP screamed like children throwing a class-4 tantrum in the Walmart for
every day that President Barack Obama was in the White House. Everything was about the debt! Everything!
We could no longer “pay” for the very wars they themselves created. We could no longer pay for the very programs
they had no problem paying for previously.
Hell, they shut down the government several times over it! They screamed and shrieked and stamped their
feet and threatened to hold their breath until their hypocritical faces turned
blue over the debt that they themselves helped expand.
And then… crickets... when their new lord and savior, Narcissist Donald
Trump, inhabited the White House. For
two years, no talk about debt or deficits. No talk about how we can afford to
pay for things as the GOP handed out tax cuts and tax breaks to corporations
and wealthy Americans. No talk about
debt ceilings. Trump starts trade wars
with China and then eagerly pledges billions in federal handouts to American
farmers for compensation, and nobody in the GOP raises even an eyebrow!
And let’s not forget Narcissist Trump’s ego-wall. A monument to his overinflated ego that costs
billions and billions more than he asks, and he
continually asks for more and more.
Oh, and it is an ego-wall that he
repeatedly promised that Mexico would pay for but now he demands that the
American taxpayers pay for.
It’s only now, when the GOP loses control of the House and the financial
purse-strings, do they start talking about debt and deficits again. These supposed “masters” of fiscal
responsibility that only seem to recognize there’s a problem when they are not
the ones in power.
That’s not taking responsibility. That’s
using the debt as a political weapon. A political
cudgel by which conservatives wield for their own exclusive use. No different than that abusive father who
uses the family’s money as a weapon to deprive his family of the essentials
while allowing him to buy luxuries.
Let’s get brutally honest here... we can never start to be responsible
with America’s financial problems as long as they are used as a weapon for one
political faction over the rest of the nation.
Yes, the debt is a problem. But
we also cannot just stop federal spending.
There are programs that need to be funded. Services that must go on. Employees and contractors that must be paid. Contrary to the Narcissistic
President’s business practices, you can’t expect those folks to work for
free.
The conservatives and the GOP as a party – a party that this commentator
used to be a card-carrying member of – have long forfeited any legitimate claim
of being fiscally responsible through their hypocritical use of the debt as a
weapon. You don’t wage unlimited war
worldwide, you don’t provoke war worldwide, you don’t hand out tax breaks and
tax cuts to the millionaires and billionaires and provoke trade wars, you don’t
shoot up the debt to where it is today, and then turn around and blame everyone
but yourselves for it. If there is any faction in the world that should be made
to sit out of all future dealings with the debt, it’s them.
By the way, it should be noted that Narcissist Trump’s trade war with
China and his demand for an ego-wall along the border with Mexico are actually
threatening two of the three largest purchasers of our debt. Do we really want to see what happens if they
decide to abruptly cash in on the notes they have? Or, worse yet, not buy any more? We’ve seen what happens when the banks do it
to ordinary Americans. They did it with
glee just ten years ago and millions of Americans suffered for it. Do you want to try it on the national scale?
The hypothetical abusive father who lords over the family finances and racks
up the debt can only go so far before forces beyond his control step in and put
an end to it. He plays a dangerous game,
but, at least with him, it’s just his family that bears the brunt of that
folly. It’s not the whole neighborhood. Or, for that matter, the whole nation.
Monday, March 4, 2019
Week of 03/04/2019
The Actual Fake News
– by David Matthews 2
– by David Matthews 2
America’s orange-skinned narcissist, President Donald Trump,
loves to throw about the term “fake news” to dismiss anything that criticizes
him or disagrees with him or his policies.
Fact-checking, for instance, is “fake news”. Reporters that question or criticize him are
“fake news”. CNN, MSNBC, NBC, the
Washington Post, are all part of the so-called “fake news media”. Truth, fact, reality, if they contradict
Trump or question him or even make him look bad, they’re all “fake news”. Only Trump is truth in the minds of his base.
Ironically, Trump’s biggest supporters are propaganda mills
and tabloid services. Places that spread
lies and juicy gossip with full-color splashes that are so absurd that they
don’t have to apologize when exposed.
Instead, they double-down even harder on the lies and rumors. Those, he considers to be “truth”, while the
truth is condemned as being “fake”.
Unfortunately, Trump’s nonsensical term “fake news” does a
far greater disservice with society, because it makes it difficult to identify
and crack down on the articles that are treated as “news” that really aren’t.
Every day I check my news feed through Google, which brings
me articles from all sorts of different sources. But, because I put in comic books and science
fiction as some of the topics to look for, I get hit with all sorts of non-news
articles. And, no, I’m not talking
advertisements. I’m talking fictional
stories passed off as “news” articles.
For instance, since when did “fan theories” become news
articles?
A website called “BGR”, aka “Boy Genius Reports”, which
claims to be an “online destination for news and commentary focused on the
mobile and consumer market”, touted a big headline banner that says “Mindblowing
‘Avengers: Endgame’ Theory Says Thanos Really Didn’t Kill Anyone With The Snap”. You know, that gut-wrenching scene at the end
of “Avengers: Infinity War” where – spoilers – Thanos won and the heroes lost
and we watch people literally disintegrate in front of us. “Boy Genius” wants us to know that, according
to a “fan theory”, that really didn’t happen.
Whether or not it is true we will never know until
“Avengers: Endgame” comes out in about one month after this column posts. But for right now, it’s just a theory. From a fan.
And BGR considers that to be “news”. And, because BGR considers that to be as much
“news” as the latest game release or tech product recall, Google then assumes
it to be news as well, so it ends up in my news feed.
The problem is that it is not news. It is wishful fantasy. From “a fan”.
It’s no different than saying that the Los Angeles Rams should have been
Super Bowl LIII Champions because some football fan “predicted” it and laid out
some complex play-by-play scenario where they would prevail. The problem is that they didn’t win. The Rams weren’t champions. The New England
Patriots won it 13-3. So the story is
just fiction.
“Fan Castings” are another kind of so-called “news story”
that wrongly appears in my news feed.
Much like the “fan theory” story, so-called “entertainment” services try
to play casting director to movies that have yet to be made.
For instance… CBR or “Comic Book Resources”, a mainstay for
comic book and comic book-related news, put this headline in their feed: “Batman Begins
Again: Who Will Play The Dark Knight?” The article is then followed by the actors
that they feel would be “better” at playing Batman than Ben Affleck was.
The problem is this… they’re not casting directors. This is not “news”. It is, again, a fan theory. It is fantasy. It is no different than the folks at
comicbook.com who re-imagined
“Thor” star Chris Hemsworth as Aquaman. Again, this is not news. This is fantasy.
So why the hell is this crap in my news feed?
The problem is that fan theories and fantasy castings and
other stories that pretend to be “news” have been causing real problems for the
entertainment world.
Long before the news came out that Warner Brothers gave up
on having Ben Affleck continue playing Batman, so-called “news articles” were
announcing the demise of Affleck’s caped crusader. Same with Henry Cavil’s role as Superman. Were they just “too soon”? Or were they goading the WB execs into doing
it? The CW, owned by Warner Brothers. is
besieged with rumors about killing off Green Arrow and Supergirl
in the forthcoming “Crisis
on Infinite Earths” event, which will air sometime this fall, even
though both shows were just quickly
renewed for the 2019-2020 season.
Even before the news came out that Peter Capaldi would
retire as BBC’s “Doctor Who”, fan theories and fantasy casting articles were
out looking to not only replace him, but to recast the titular character as a woman. Did that influence BBC execs in their
eventual decision to give the title to Jodi Whittaker? Was that the reason why Capaldi stepped
down? What sort of shows could we have
gotten from that series if not for the deluge of fiction passed off as “news”?
And it’s not just the entertainment section afflicted with
this garbage. My business news feed
catches the occasional “breaking news” about some future merger that exists
only in the mind of some “speculator”.
Or the “warning” of some financial catastrophe if people don’t make some
kind of financial decision that smacks more of a commercial than a “news article”.
And politics? Oh the
fantasy stories churn out almost as fast as Trump’s lies about who is “about”
to run for president in 2020 and who is “likely” to win. The
so-called “political experts” and their polling data – all of which should have
been fired after the 2016 fraud – are already trying to manipulate the 2020
elections before the Russians can do it.
All of these are considered “news” according to Google, so
they end up in my news feed.
Let’s get brutally honest here... as long as news services
continue to churn out fictional stories and pass them off as “news”, it is
difficult, if not impossible to counter the lies and propaganda from Narcissist
Trump and his red-hat supporters, never mind refute claims of “fake news”. Because, guess what? It’s there!
There is fiction being passed off as “news”, and not just from lazy
so-called “journalists” like Stephen
Glass or Jayson Blair.
Now I can understand why websites like CBR and BGR pass off
the fraud of fan theories and fantasy castings as “news articles”. It’s all about the “clicks” to them. It’s about getting the attention of readers
so they will visit the website and get the ad revenue. But it also takes away space from the really
important stories. The stuff that we
really should be informed about.
And, yeah, I get it.
Sometimes the studios aren’t that responsive about upcoming movies and
TV shows. They have a schedule about how
much information to share before the “big release”, and people just don’t want
to wait. Certainly the websites that
rely on those “clicks” can’t afford to be patient.
But the actual news services? The ones that pride themselves in their
“journalistic integrity”? They really
have no excuse. If anything, they
actually help Trump and his enablers.
They give credence to Trump’s claim of “fake news”. How can they be trusted if they spread
fiction masquerading as “news”? Even if
it’s for “clicks”, it’s still not right.
The news services have a responsibility to the public in
that the information they present is factual and honest. It is as important to them as fidelity is to
a marriage. When that trust is broken,
it’s hard to rebuild it. This not a call
for legislation or regulation, because this is something that the government
cannot fix. Rather, this is a call for
the news services and those that put them in our news feed to clean up their
act. There is no place for “fan
theories”, fantasy castings, daily polls, or political or business “speculations”
in a news service or a news feed.
You can’t counter Trump’s “fake news” slur by simply saying
that you’re not. You counter it with facts,
integrity, honesty, and the truth. And
that can’t be a “sometime” thing as long as ratings or readership or “clicks”
allow it. That’s truly the difference
between the news that we want to trust and the tabloids that Trump and his ilk
seem to prefer.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)